MetOSPatient 360
Review glucose/CGM, metabolic trends, body composition, reports, medicines and patient questions in one clinically relevant view.
Doctor experience preview
A clearer picture before the consultation starts.
The planned MetOS Doctor experience brings Patient 360 context, reports, glucose/CGM, vitals, body composition, medicines, care gaps and patient questions into one review workspace while preserving clinical judgement.
Illustrative doctor review screenFictional patient · Demo values
Patient 360 previewAnanya Mehta
Review due today
42 years · Type 2 diabetes · Weight management
Last consultation: 20 August · Latest report uploaded: 12 September
HbA1c7.1%was 8.2% · 12 weeks
Time in range76%up 17 percentage points
Weight78.4 kgdown 5.7 kg
Blood pressure124/78latest reading
New laboratory reportHbA1c, kidney function and lipids · uploaded 12 September
Needs reviewGlucose patternPost-dinner rise seen on 4 of the last 7 recorded days
View contextPatient question“Should I change the timing of my evening walk?”
Reply at reviewCurrent agreed plan
- Continue the prescribed treatment plan until clinician review
- 10-minute walk after dinner on at least five days each week
- Specialist follow-up scheduled for 18 September, 4:30 PM
This screen is illustrative and does not contain real patient information. The doctor workspace will be opened only through controlled clinical pilots.
Designed around clinical review
Useful information without handing decisions to software.
MetOS is intended to organise evidence and patient context. The qualified clinician remains responsible for diagnosis, prescriptions and treatment changes.
Source & provenance
Keep original reports, recorded values, source labels, verification status and update times visible for clinical review.
Care-gap review
Surface contextually relevant missing tests, follow-up needs and unresolved actions for clinician review rather than automated treatment.
Medication context
See medication history and patient-reported adherence alongside results and trends without allowing Mo to change treatment.
Review queue
Prioritise new reports, patient questions and changes requiring professional attention before or between consultations.
Close the loop
Document agreed actions and let the authorised care team coordinate reminders, repeat tests, appointments and follow-up.
✓
Clinical accountability remains clear: Mo may help organise and explain recorded information, but it will not independently diagnose, prescribe or change treatment.
Planned review flow
From patient context to a clinician-led decision.
The patient chooses to share information. MetOS organises it for review. The doctor verifies the context and decides what care is appropriate.
1
Patient sharesReports, readings, progress and questions reach the review view.
2
MetOS organisesRelevant changes and source details are presented together.
3
Doctor decidesThe qualified clinician reviews, discusses and updates care when appropriate.
MetOS doctor view
Launching through controlled clinical pilots.
Specialists and health systems can contact us to discuss pilot readiness, workflow fit and clinical validation.